Obama's Warning Signs......

First Obama claims victory and now they (MSM) are saying Obama should pick a republican for his VP. Well he won't get my vote no matter who his VP. is. Yes not even Hillary Clinton. Don't they get it in Washington? Don't they see all the warning signs around Obama? He has been a member of Reverend Jeremiah Wrights church for 20 years. They have seen the hate he spews at Americans and Americans know he sat in the reverends pews, he didn't walk out. Then lets talk experience or should I say inexperience....What has he really told us about his policies on things like national security, immigration, foreign affairs. What President Bush said last week wasn't totally off base. Obama has said he would meet with leaders of other country's without preconditions. It went down like this....Question was...

In 1982, Anwar Sadat traveled to Israel, a trip that resulted in a peace agreement that has lasted ever since. In the spirit of that type of bold leadership, would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?

Obama's answer.....

I would. And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them -- which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration -- is ridiculous. Now, Ronald Reagan and Democratic presidents like JFK constantly spoke to Soviet Union at a time when Ronald Reagan called them an evil empire. And the reason is because they understood that we may not trust them and they may pose an extraordinary danger to this country, but we had the obligation to find areas where we can potentially move forward.

Clinton's answer......

Well, I will not promise to meet with the leaders of these countries during my first year. I will promise a very vigorous diplomatic effort because I think it is not that you promise a meeting at that high a level before you know what the intentions are. I don't want to be used for propaganda purposes. I don't want to make a situation even worse. But I certainly agree that we need to get back to diplomacy, which has been turned into a bad word by this administration. And I will purse very vigorous diplomacy.

And I will use a lot of high-level presidential envoys to test the waters, to feel the way. But certainly, we're not going to just have our president meet with Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez and, you know, the president of North Korea, Iran and Syria until we know better what the way forward would be.

Edwards even had a better answer than inexperienced Obama....

Yes, and I think actually Senator Clinton's right though. Before that meeting takes place, we need to do the work, the diplomacy, to make sure that that meeting's not going to be used for propaganda purposes, will not be used to just beat down the United States of America in the world community. But I think this is just a piece of a bigger question, which is, what do we actually do? What should the president of the United States do to restore America's moral leadership in the world. It's not enough just to meet with bad leaders. In addition to that, the world needs to hear from the president of the United States about who we are, what it is we represent.

Obama's inexperience shows all the time and the democratic party wants us to fall in line and vote for him. Not this democrat, no I think the president of this country needs more experience than just being a freshman senator. What was it , just two years ago he was a Illinois state legislator? Does that qualify him to run this country? What are his legislative accomplishments? I can't find any executive or corporate accomplishments...Am I over looking them? No they are not there. What has he done? Has he ever put on a uniform and served this country? No.... Just what does he know about the way the military works. Was he known internationally before this campaign? No....he is unknown on the international side of things... What we do know is he has ties to Mr. Anthony Rezko, (another warning sign), and I really can't see this as a plus sign for Obama eaither. About the flag pin, now it is being said he puts it on when he is in front of the people but takes it off when he gets back on his plane. I don't know, I can't find anything from a reporter who is on the plane with him but I did find this at NRO. The flag means a great deal to a lot of people. Then there is Ayers,(warning sign) I mean really how bad is it going to get by November.

On C-SPAN Thursday, Judical Watch, Cliff Kincaid said he had asked G Gordan Liddy an EX-FBI agent "Knowing what you know about Barak Obama could he get a security clearance?" "The FBI looks into somebody's background and look at issues like character, loyalty, loyalty to the United States and associations with communist and other unsavory characters and he said well the FBI didn't per say recommend somebody for a security clearance, for or against, but just assembles the information for an appropriate agency to make that judgment. But he said of course in his own view Barak Obama would never be able to get such a security clearance in the United States government." The fact is though under the constitution he can run, anyone can run if you meet those minimal requirements and if he wins, if he wins the presidency as Liddy was telling me, Barack Obama gets to see everything, all of our secrets, all of our state secrets." Now do we really know enough about Obama to put him in the White House? Cliff Kincaid went on to say that there was going to be a press release this week and you can learn about it here. I don't know if it will be anything because if they really had something, why wouldn't they release it now? I don't believe much of what I read online at some of these places so they are going to have to have a lot of proof for what ever it is.

Then lets not forget the British-Iraqi billionaire, Mr.Auchi.(warning sign) Here is a piece from back in February that is worth looking at. There was a lot of talk in February about Nadhmi Auchi and I am sure the GOP or the 527's will be bringing it back up. Why wouldn't they?

This "Change"thing, well has he really said what he is going to change? And with so little experience how he will achieve this change what ever it maybe. This is one of those who, what , when, where and why questions that Barak Obama needs to answer. Will it be good change? Is change just a slogan for his campaign? Also he claims he wants to reunite this nation. I don't see him bringing Americans together, I see him dividing them. He has gotten 90% of the black vote, and I do understand why, but if 90% of white voters vote their skin color what are we going to have then? We are going to have a racial divide in this country like we had forty years ago. Is this the kind of "Change" Barak is talking about? I don't see this as good change but yet it is the change he has brought us so far. And another thing it seems that it is alright to vote skin color if you are black but if you are white , now thats a different story. (I think this could be a warning sign also.)

I have been called raciest for not supporting Barak Obama. Let people call me that because I have heard it so many times now it doesn't bother me like it did. I just want someone in the White House that is qualified to be there because we all know what happens if we elect someone who isn't. I am more familiar with Hillary Clinton and John McCain and what they have done in the past for this country. My vote will go to one of them. As a democrat I would like for it to be Senator Clinton but if Obama is the nominee for the party it will be John McCain. Yes I will vote for a republican for president for the first time in my life.

As a democrat I don't see how the party leaders could overlook all the warning signs around Barak Obama. There are more I am sure that I have not listed here so I will just say to be continued................